|
Thousands
predicted at bicentennial events, sites
By
John Krist
Senior reporter
 |
Staff photo
by John Krist
A statue at Fort Benton, Mont., depicts Meriwether
Lewis, William Clark and Sacagewea, the Shoshone
woman who aided them. |
Two
years ago, the University of Montana's Institute for
Tourism and Recreation Research commissioned a nationwide
survey of public interest in the bicentennial of the
Lewis and Clark expedition. The survey results alarmed
even the most boosterish community leaders.
Twenty-six percent of those surveyed said they were
interested in visiting Montana in the next five years.
About half of those potential visitors said they'd like
to attend an event associated with the Lewis and Clark
bicentennial, which formally will begin in Virginia
at Thomas Jefferson's home, Monticello, on Jan. 18,
2003.
Extrapolating,
the researchers said the survey results suggest that
as many as 45 million Americans could be enticed to
visit Montana to share in its celebration of the Lewis
and Clark expedition, which traveled more miles in that
state than in any of the 10 others along its route from
St. Louis to the Pacific. If all those visitors showed
up in the same year, it would boost the state's annual
tourist count 500 percent.
At
the very least, the report said, Montana should expect
8.9 million extra visitors from out of state during
the bicentennial years of 2003-2006.
"If
the figures are true," Travel Montana director
Matthew Cohn told a local newspaper when the report
was released, "it goes way beyond anything we could
prepare for."
Along
the trail, there's a lot of ambivalence -- even skepticism
-- about those numbers. Yet throughout the West, bicentennial
committee members and business owners cite the survey's
tourism projections hopefully as they prepare for what
could be the longest, most wide-ranging campaign of
national celebration since the 1976 bicentennial of
the American revolution.
This
will be the second time the nation as a whole has looked
back on the Lewis and Clark expedition, mining it for
clues about the American character. There are distinct
differences, however, between the centennial celebration,
which ushered in the 20th century, and the bicentennial
observance, which greets the 21st. The contrast suggests
that the Corps of Discovery's journey is not just a
chapter in American history but a sort of national Rorschach
test -- an ink blot that each generation interprets
according to its own preconceptions and preoccupations.
On
the trail
One
reason for ambivalence about the tourism survey's projections
is that much of the Lewis and Clark trail passes through
states that are sparsely populated and have limited
means of accommodating a crush of visitors. This also
poses a significant challenge to the formidable publicity
machine that is gearing up to promote the bicentennial.
Montana,
for example, although the fourth-largest U.S. state,
has fewer than a million residents and a population
density of only 6.2 people per square mile (the nationwide
figure is 79.6 per square mile). Montana's largest city,
Billings, has fewer than 90,000 residents. North Dakota
has only 642,000 residents, 9.3 per square mile, and
its biggest city -- Fargo -- counts only 91,000 residents.
Local
land managers and business owners in these largely rural
states often said they find it hard to believe that
so many people from so far away will make the trek to
historical sites that frequently are remote and in many
cases cannot accommodate more than a handful of visitors
at a time. At the same time, however, those responsible
for administering and protecting those sites feel compelled
to plan for a potential crush.
In
Idaho's Clearwater National Forest, for example, where
the primitive Lolo Motorway follows the Lewis and Clark
expedition's tortuous route across the rugged Bitterroot
Mountains, a permit system will be put in effect as
soon as this summer and will stay in place until 2007,
unless visitation drops significantly before then. The
number of people and vehicles allowed to set out across
the motorway each day will be strictly limited, with
permits available through a lottery.
"We
want the Lewis and Clark bicentennial visitors to have
a memorable experience, but the Lolo Trail corridor
is a primitive area, with minimal development,"
Forest Supervisor James Caswell wrote in a memo explaining
his decision. "Capacity is limited due to primitive
road conditions, few suitable camping areas, and many
sensitive cultural and vegetative sites."
If
the anticipated crush of visitors doesn't materialize,
it won't be for lack of trying on the part of the travel
industry and public agencies with an interest in recreation.
The number of efforts to commemorate and capitalize
on the expedition during the next four years is growing
almost daily.
Besides
the individual activities of countless entrepreneurs
-- offering clients everything from Lewis and Clark
canoe and horseback trips to luxurious riverboat cruises,
bicycle adventures, recreational-vehicle caravans, summer
camps and narrated bus tours -- there is a National
Council of the Lewis and Clark Bicentennial to coordinate
events nationwide. It has endorsed 10 "national
signature events" along the trail, and its calendar
already lists more than a score of other major events
during the next three years.
In
addition, there are dozens of state and regional bicentennial
commissions (Montana alone has 15), and countless local
historical societies and tribal organizations with committees
devoted to the expedition. The Lewis and Clark Trail
Heritage Foundation has 31 chapters. There is even a
Lewis and Clark Bicentennial Congressional Caucus with
23 members in the Senate and 50 in the House of Representatives.
Although
most of the bicentennial events -- ranging from historical
re-enactments to festivals, seminars and conferences
-- will be in the 11 states touched by the expedition's
route, the National Park Service will try to ensure
that no one is left out by launching the "Corps
of Discovery II." The traveling exhibit, transported
by three 18-wheelers, will visit metropolitan areas
well away from the expedition's actual route -- Atlanta,
Memphis, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Phoenix, Denver,
Minneapolis, Detroit.
 |
Staff photo
by John Krist
A new visitor center just north of St. Louis will
commemorate Camp Wood, where the Corps of discovery
spent the winter before beginning its journey. It
is one of several projects being built in conjunction
with the bicentennial. |
Millions
of taxpayers' dollars have already been spent on projects
related to the bicentennial; more will be allocated
in coming years. New visitor centers are under construction
or planned at several sites along the trail -- at Camp
Wood River in Illinois, on Lost Trail Pass in Idaho,
in Sioux City, Iowa -- as are parking lots and interpretive
signs.
The
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers told Columbia River Basin
Indian tribes that it had $200 million to help Native
Americans tell their side of the Lewis and Clark story,
mostly by installing signs, restrooms and parking lots
at interpretive sites along the trail. Congress has
approved $1 million to build the Sacajawea Interpretive,
Cultural, and Education Center in Salmon, Idaho. In
Montana, the state's Lewis and Clark Bicentennial Commission
has approved $400,000 in grants in the past two years
to support projects sponsored by local communities and
nonprofit groups, including books, signs, exhibits and
visitor facilities. The National Park Service issued
$1.27 million in grants last year for 99 bicentennial
projects in at least a dozen states.
Capitalizing
on history
The
impulse to commemorate the bicentennial and the Corps
of Discovery -- or exploit them, cynics might say --
extends into other arenas as well.
A
dollar coin honoring Sacagawea, the teen-age Shoshone
mother who accompanied the explorers and played an important
role in the success of their journey, was issued in
February 2000. North Dakota and Idaho have new Lewis
and Clark license plates. The U.S. Navy has announced
it will name a new class of vessel after the explorers,
with individual ships bearing the names of Lewis, Clark
and Sacagawea.
In
January 2001, President Clinton designated some of the
wild countryside around the expedition's route in central
Montana as Missouri Breaks National Monument. At the
same time, he established Pompeys Tower National Monument
along the Yellowstone River in southern Montana, preserving
a landmark upon which Clark carved his name -- still
the only physical evidence of the expedition along the
trail.
Clinton
also retroactively promoted Lt. William Clark to captain
(giving him equal rank to Lewis and finally making good
on a promise Lewis and Thomas Jefferson had made to
Clark when they offered him the job). Along with this
bit of historical revisionism, Clinton conferred the
title of "honorary sergeant, regular Army"
on Sacagawea and on York, Clark's black slave, both
of whom played important roles in the expedition but
neither of whom would have been eligible for such recognition
in the early 19th century.
And
no major anniversary would be complete without product
tie-ins. It's already possible to buy a wide variety
of Lewis and Clark merchandise at gift shops along the
trail: books and videos about the explorers and the
places they visited, CDs and cassettes of period music,
replicas of expedition hardware such as tin lanterns,
fire-making kits, compasses, telescopes and a portable
writing desk (advertised as "America's first laptop"),
"fine-art" prints, note cards and paintings,
commemorative coins and medals, even blankets, decanters,
mugs, keychains and other trinkets bearing images of
expedition members.
There's
a plush toy dog modeled after Lewis' Newfoundland, Seaman,
which accompanied the explorers (the toy is a perfect
companion to Seaman's "autobiography," recently
published as a children's book). Land Rover exhorts
potential buyers to "find your inner Lewis &
Clark" in an ad campaign for a sport utility vehicle.
If
that weren't enough, the National Council of the Lewis
and Clark Bicentennial reported in a memo last summer
to its Circle of State Advisers that it "has been
in communication with a wholesaler of products (T-shirts,
backpacks, journals, key chains, etc) that is willing
to conduct marketing research on the council's behalf
in an attempt to determine what products stores would
be willing to have on their shelves. The National Council
is also looking at what products would allow for individual
state marks that would generate monies back to the states."
Planning
for the bicentennial involves more, however, than product
endorsements, tourism marketing campaigns and political
use of the explorers' heroic image. The very meaning
of the Lewis and Clark expedition itself is up for grabs,
the subject of intensifying debate among scholars, environmental
activists, Native American tribal leaders and social
critics.
The
boosters
When
the nation observed the centennial of the Lewis and
Clark expedition, there was little disagreement over
what it had meant, or how the anniversary ought to be
commemorated. There were two primary events: the Louisiana
Purchase Exposition in St. Louis in 1903-04, and Portland's
Lewis and Clark Exposition, which opened in 1905. Both
were unabashed in their celebration of the purchase
and the first exploration of the West as advancing America's
manifest destiny to conquer the continent.
In
his address on April 30, 1903, at the dedication ceremonies
of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition, President Theodore
Roosevelt summed up the tenor of the time and the uncomplicated
way in which the events of the preceding century were
viewed.
"When
we acquired it," Roosevelt declared of the Louisiana
Territory, "we made evident once (and) for all
that consciously and of set purpose we had embarked
on a career of expansion, that we had taken our place
among those daring and hardy nations who risk much with
the hope and desire of winning high position among the
great powers of the earth."
"This
work of expansion was by far the greatest work of our
people during the years that intervened between the
adoption of the Constitution and the outbreak of the
Civil War."
There were other questions of real moment and importance,
and there were many which at the time seemed such to
those engaged in answering them; but the greatest feat
of our forefathers of those generations was the deed
of the men who, with pack-train or wagon-train, on horseback,
on foot, or by boat upon the waters, pushed the frontier
ever westward across the continent.
Continuing
this theme, the Portland exposition's motto was "Westward
the Course of Empire Takes Its Way." The official
seal depicts Lewis and Clark standing on the shore of
the western sea, a setting sun blazing forth in all
its glory. They gaze off into the distance, hands raised
as if in greeting, while between them a fair-haired
Lady Liberty -- dressed in a diaphanous white gown and
wrapped in an American flag -- stands with one arm around
each explorer's shoulder.
Besides
lavishing praise on the nation's inexorable push westward,
the expositions also were excuses to promote local and
regional economic opportunities. Sponsored by businesses
as well as by local government officials, they were
intended to highlight the host cities' advantages as
places to invest, to live, to work. Portland's Lewis
and Clark Exposition featured acres of gleaming white
buildings stuffed to overflowing with exhibits about
the natural resources of the Pacific Northwest as well
as examples of the region's agricultural and industrial
products.
"The
extravaganza of a world's fair gave Portland a chance
to show itself off and opened new opportunities for
growth," Carl Abbott, a professor of urban studies
and planning at Portland State University, wrote in
"The Great Extravaganza," his book about the
Lewis and Clark Exposition. "It offered an older
generation an occasion to work the strings of power
one more time, and it gave a new generation a chance
to shape the city in which it wanted to live."
Somewhere
on the way to the 21st century, however, doubt began
to erode the ideas celebrated by the centennial expositions
--assumptions that growth is always good, that natural
resources exist to be exploited, that westward expansion
should be regarded as America's sacred destiny rather
than the violent conquest of an already inhabited land.
Accordingly, the bicentennial has drawn a chorus of
dissenting voices unlike anything heard 100 years ago.
The loudest concern the fate of Native Americans, plants
and wildlife, and even the western landscape itself,
in the years after the Corps of Discovery's journey
helped turn the nation's attention toward the Pacific.
Telling
the stories
The
Sierra Club, for example, has launched a five-year campaign
called "Wild America" to protect wilderness
areas along the expedition's route (as well as some
Lewis and Clark never saw). Citing the damaging effects
of clear-cutting, dams, road construction, oil and natural
gas drilling, pollution and habitat destruction on the
wild country described in the explorers' journals, it
calls for a variety of conservation measures.
"Our
hope is to use the bicentennial of Lewis and Clark to
help America rediscover these incredible lands and urge
Americans to advocate the protection and restoration
of our remaining wild places," the club says in
its profile of the campaign. "Our goal is to permanently
protect the 56 million acres of remaining wildlands
in Lewis and Clark country, preserve and protect key
wildlife habitat, and protect threatened and endangered
species like bison, wolves, grizzly bears and salmon."
American
Rivers, another environmental advocacy organization,
has launched what it calls "Voyage of Recovery:
Restoring the Rivers of Lewis and Clark." Its goal
is to use the bicentennial to attract attention to the
environmental damage wrought by years of efforts to
"tame" the Missouri River with dams and levees,
and to reverse that damage through changes in dam operation
and ecological restoration projects.
"Today,
we can only imagine what Lewis and Clark experienced
on the Missouri River almost 200 years ago," the
organization says in its brochure describing the campaign.
"But if we begin a Voyage of Recovery today, we
can re-create a river that supports wildlife, recreation
and tourism and is an invaluable asset to the communities
along its banks -- a conservation legacy to commemorate
the bicentennial of their epic journey."
Native
tribes have also been reluctant to participate in the
celebration of the Lewis and Clark bicentennial. There
are a number of reasons for this, but perhaps the most
significant is that the expedition marked the beginning
of the end of their way of life. Rather than a glorious
era of national expansion, the opening of the West meant
for them dispossession and cultural disintegration.
"Although
some people celebrate the scientific purposes of the
expedition, Lewis and Clark symbolize other aspects
of the journey to Indian people," Julie Cajune,
a member of the Salish and Kootenai tribes in western
Montana, wrote in a Forest Service newsletter about
the bicentennial. "The expedition was also a business
trip, to reconnoiter natural resources that could be
exploited. To many Indian people, the story of Lewis
and Clark is not separate from the story that followed,
which includes decimation of whole animal populations,
taking of Indian lands and suppression of tribal cultures."
To
many Native Americans, the bicentennial offers a chance
to ensure that their history is at last woven into the
texture of American history.
"We
have our own stories about Sakakawea, Lewis and Clark,"
said Calvin Grinnell, a cultural preservation development
specialist for the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort
Berthold Reservation in North Dakota. "Tribes come
and go, people come and go. These are sad facts. We
have a lot of suffering we have endured over the years.
Now, we have to tell that story, a story to lay alongside
the others."
|